<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For the want of 4&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/06/for-the-want-of-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/06/for-the-want-of-4/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoebox</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/06/for-the-want-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-37531</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoebox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6195#comment-37531</guid>
		<description>As much as I think these folks ought to be forever banned from having &quot;Republican&quot; attached to them in any manner other than with the adjective &quot;former&quot;, This bill would have passed even if all 8 of them had voted against it.  Pelosi had more than enough votes to get this done.  She would have wrangled 8 more Dems if she had needed to.  The only things that their votes did was give 8 Dems &quot;plausible deniability&quot; by having 8 additional slots to vote &quot;no&quot;.  Also, it will allow Nancy and her dimwits to run about telling people that this was &quot;bipartisan.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I think these folks ought to be forever banned from having &#8220;Republican&#8221; attached to them in any manner other than with the adjective &#8220;former&#8221;, This bill would have passed even if all 8 of them had voted against it.  Pelosi had more than enough votes to get this done.  She would have wrangled 8 more Dems if she had needed to.  The only things that their votes did was give 8 Dems &#8220;plausible deniability&#8221; by having 8 additional slots to vote &#8220;no&#8221;.  Also, it will allow Nancy and her dimwits to run about telling people that this was &#8220;bipartisan.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Are So Screwed &#124; bRight &#38; Early</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/06/for-the-want-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-37529</link>
		<dc:creator>We Are So Screwed &#124; bRight &#38; Early</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6195#comment-37529</guid>
		<description>[...] to Steveegg for the names and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Steveegg for the names and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

