Comments on: The case against Obama http://norunnyeggs.com/2008/10/the-case-against-obama/ The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:59:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: steveegg http://norunnyeggs.com/2008/10/the-case-against-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-36417 steveegg Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:19:03 +0000 http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=3672#comment-36417 Matt, you ignorant, and I do mean IGNORANT, slut. Matt, you ignorant, and I do mean IGNORANT, slut.

]]> By: The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama | Right Voices http://norunnyeggs.com/2008/10/the-case-against-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-36416 The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama | Right Voices Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:43:29 +0000 http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=3672#comment-36416 [...] No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The case against Obama [...] [...] No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The case against Obama [...]

]]> By: Shoebox http://norunnyeggs.com/2008/10/the-case-against-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-36415 Shoebox Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:50:22 +0000 http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=3672#comment-36415 Matt, Fortunately, McCain's disabilities are limited to his physical abilities. Obama's are obviously inhibiting his cranial faculties. He has been completely unaware of strongly held positions of those he has held in high esteem for 20 years, can't hold to a consistent policy for any 2 week period and seems to be unable to refer to a being living outside of the womb as a "baby", "Infant" or even "alive." I'll go with the physical handicap thankyou. I don't need anyone that can physically beat up a foreign despot (we've got a pretty effective military when that's required), I just want one that will lay consistent security boundaries that won't bend because he has some how determined that we "deserved" what we got. Matt,

Fortunately, McCain’s disabilities are limited to his physical abilities. Obama’s are obviously inhibiting his cranial faculties. He has been completely unaware of strongly held positions of those he has held in high esteem for 20 years, can’t hold to a consistent policy for any 2 week period and seems to be unable to refer to a being living outside of the womb as a “baby”, “Infant” or even “alive.”

I’ll go with the physical handicap thankyou. I don’t need anyone that can physically beat up a foreign despot (we’ve got a pretty effective military when that’s required), I just want one that will lay consistent security boundaries that won’t bend because he has some how determined that we “deserved” what we got.

]]> By: matt lepree http://norunnyeggs.com/2008/10/the-case-against-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-36414 matt lepree Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:27:10 +0000 http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=3672#comment-36414 Let's talk about the man who is 100 percent disabled, over a thousand dollars a week in veterans disability, and yet can hike the grand canyon, and work for 35 years in government svc. Also voted againsted most increases for Veterans benefits. I for one don't want someone 100 percent disabled to lead this country. Let’s talk about the man who is 100 percent disabled, over a thousand dollars a week in veterans disability, and yet can hike the grand canyon, and work for 35 years in government svc. Also voted againsted most increases for Veterans benefits. I for one don’t want someone 100 percent disabled to lead this country.

]]>