No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

[powered by WordPress.]

Day by Day cartoon

Jimmy and the definition of Legitimacy

by @ 7:00 on April 22, 2008. Filed under Politics - National.

Jimmy Carter says that while he will talk with an organization that launches attacks against unarmed civilians and is listed as a group responsible for terrorist attacks by most western countries, Hamas, he doesn’t ”see any redeeming features” of another terrorist organization, Al Qaeda. 


I can’t seem to get the link to work correctly so here’s the low tech connection :  http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=81983

According to Jimmy, the difference between Hamas and Al Qaeda is that Hamas has the support of their constituents.  To Jimmy an elected government is legitimate and should be accepted regardless of what it’s policies are.

Using Jimmy’s logic, Jimmy should also agree that the Civil war was unjust and just the North imposing it’s will on the South.  After all, the Confederate States of America had the support of its constituents.

If only Abraham Lincoln had had the benefit of Jimmy Carter’s logic the country could have avoided the war and the loss of 620,000 American lives.  It would have been so much better for everyone……except for the 4,000,000 slaves that were emancipated.

Revisions/extensions (10:59 am 4/22/2008; steveegg) - I think I’ve got the right embed code. Still, I like the folks at Breitbart, including the absent-from-blogging Ian Schwartz, who if memory serves is one of the main guys behind the TV version of Breitbart.

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://norunnyeggs.com/2008/04/jimmy-and-the-definition-of-legitimacy/trackback/

3 Responses to “Jimmy and the definition of Legitimacy”

  1. steveegg said on April 22nd, 2008 at 11:02:

    Didn’t Al Qaeda once have the support of the Afghanis? What a fucking buffoon the Peanut Farmer is.

    Say, did you see how fast Hamas made Carter look like the old fool he is?

  2. Shoebox said on April 22nd, 2008 at 11:30:

    I guess it’s open for debate whether the Afganis “supported” AQ….there weren’t any elections. I was originally thinking Nazis as the comparison but they had the same issue, no real elections.

    I don’t see how Carter can even start with these knuckleheads. How do you believe anything they say when their core belief remains that Israel doesn’t have the right to exist….how does a peace process or truce have any integrity with that issue still in the mix?

  3. steveegg said on April 22nd, 2008 at 12:50:

    I wish I knew how a peace process with either Hamas or Fatah the PLO has integrity. If I were feeling charitable (I’m not), I would say that Carter was hoping lightning would strike twice.

    On a related note, the most-undercovered element of the Middle East over the last 7 years has been how relations have thawed between Jordan and Israel. Hmmm, you don’t suppose the Bush administration had anything to do with that, do you?

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

[powered by WordPress.]

51 queries. 1.184 seconds